Answering your questions

About underground thermal energy storage

We asked 5800 people in the Netherlands, Germany, Czech Republic and UK what they would ask an expert about underground heat storage. Their responses are summarised here and answered by members of the PUSH-IT consortium.

What is underground thermal energy storage, and how does it work?

What is underground thermal energy storage?

Answered by the PUSH-IT team:
Underground thermal energy (heat) storage is a technology that stores energy as heat beneath the earth’s surface. Heat from power plants, factories, and renewable energy sources (e.g., solar, geothermal) can be collected in summer. The heat is then stored underground until it is needed in winter, for example, to supply local or district heat networks. This can help reduce the use of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas. The hotter the temperature, the more energy stored. In PUSH-IT, scientists are testing three ways to store heat up to 90°C. These are mine thermal energy storage (MTES), borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) and aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES)

Why are you doing this, is it really necessary?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft:
We need many novel technologies in the energy transition. Due to intermittency of available renewable energy and varying demand heat storage is one of the technologies we need in our energy system.

Is underground thermal energy storage natural or human-made?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:
The subsurface is natural – but we make wells to access the subsurface. The fluids used in the subsurface are those naturally there, and we heat them up or cool them down to store energy.

At what temperature is the heat stored?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:
This depends on the energy system used. At present the maximum designed temperature is 90 °C, but it can be stored as low as 20 °C. At higher temperatures we can store more energy in a smaller space, but the engineering is more challenging.

How long does it take for the water to heat up?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:
We aim to store seasonally, i.e. produce the heat in the winter and extract in the summer. So the subsurface is slowly heated over around 3 – 6 months.

Can the stored heat be specifically split into different temperature ranges? For example, for heating AND hot water at the same time?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:
Usually not, but the above ground energy system can do this, i.e. by using a heat pump or further locally heating water for hot water.

How do you extract the heat out of the source into the water?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:

We use a heat exchanger. This is a piece of equipment where two closed pipes are close to each other allowing energy to be exchanged, while the water does not mix. 

Where is the heat production for storage carried out?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University: 

This depends – in general the storage systems can work with any energy that is available – this makes it very flexible. Some care needs to be taken on making sure the temperature levels from production and use are compatible, i.e. as close as possible.  

Will it be a pump-driven system?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:

Typically, water is pumped around the system – this usually uses very little energy. Heat pumps are used when the temperature of storage and needed temperature are not the same. By making these temperatures close together, the energy used by the heat pump can be optimised. 

Does the water need to be refreshed?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:

The groundwater that is found in the subsurface is used in open systems and in closed systems clean water is added at the start and can be used for a long time. 

What happens when capacity is reached?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:

As we use the subsurface, there is not a fixed capacity, however there is a range of capacities where a certain system cannot perform well. After this capacity is reached no more energy can be stored. 

How can this stored energy be used to generate electricity?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:

Typically, not at the temperatures we are considering storing. To generate electricity efficiently, this should be >120°C. We are focusing on storing heat for heating purposes. 

Can the technology be combined with geothermal/solar energy/heat pumps?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:  

Yes – absolutely. This is the aim of the technology to support these generation technologies. In addition, other sources, such as waste heat, can be used. 

Are possible modifications to the heating system necessary?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:

This depends on the exact design of the energy system. By increasing temperatures (as we are focusing on) fewer modifications to existing heating systems will be needed.  

Why is underground heat storage considered the best option — how does it compare to other energy sources and storage methods (e.g., fossil fuels, sand batteries, nuclear) in terms of cost, efficiency, environmental impact, and long-term sustainability?

Answered by Dr. Wen Liu, energy systems modeller, Utrecht University:  

In a district heating system with sustainable heat supply technologies, for example, geothermal heat and heat from solar collectors, underground thermal storage can help to increase the share of sustainable heat supply. Underground thermal energy has much higher thermal capacity than sand batteries. However, most sustainable district heating system with underground thermal storage are more expensive than fossil based heating or solar collector for individual house (see Figure. 10 in the paper Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage: A techno-economic literature review.). 

How do mine thermal energy storage, borehole thermal energy storage and aquifer thermal energy storage compare in terms of effectiveness, cost and risks, and suitability for various geological and energy needs?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

Thermal Energy Storage systems are custom-made for every site,site; there is no rule-of-thumb to say which is the best. Generally, mine thermal energy storage is the most suitable for areas with the presence of flooded underground mines, aquifer thermal energy storage is suitable in areas with sedimentary rocks (sandstones etc.) and borehole thermal energy storage is suitable especially in crystalline rocks (granite, gneiss, etc.). The aim of the PUSH-IT project is to gather information from six test sites located across Europe over the period of several years and constrain the uncertainties in the determination of these parameters. 

In terms of costs, the largest expense is the drilling work itself. borehole thermal energy storage technology is the most expensive, because it requires tens of boreholes for reasonable effectivity. mine thermal energy storage and aquifer thermal energy storage technologies are already efficient with only two wells. Once the systems are up and running, the only operational cost is running the pumps for heat extraction, which is not particularly costly. The return on investment for these systems cannot be estimated at present. It depends heavily on the development of fossil fuel prices. 

Each technology has different risks and advantages. The biggest challenge for the borehole thermal energy storage system is drilling the boreholes as close as possible to each other without intersecting any of the boreholes. The main advantage is its flexibility (can be implemented almost in any rock environment) and closed system operation (no issues related to mineral precipitation, no water exchange between the boreholes and rock environment). 

aquifer thermal energy storage, on the other hand, requires specific geological conditions for implementation, because it is an open system. The target horizon has to be porous enough, insulated from above and located significantly deep below any drinking water sources to avoid any potential contamination. The advantage is that aquifer thermal energy storage has a high efficiency already in the first year of operation (can yield more heat and higher temperature compared to borehole thermal energy storage). 

The major technical challenge for mine thermal energy storage is precise targeting of the borehole into the flooded shaft. Potential leak of stored water into another shaft is also a risk. Benefits are similar to aquifer thermal energy storage, however an additional benefit is that old mining areas are usually less sensitive to environmental issues. 

How deep are the aquifers used for aquifer thermal energy storage, what are the technical limitations of heat storage there, and how safe would this be?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft: 

aquifer thermal energy storage is commonly applied in aquifers at 50-300m but in principle can be applied at any depth, but deeper is usually not financially efficient. The main limitations relate to permeability of the aquifer, and the presence of a sealing overburden. There are no safety risks related to aquifer thermal energy storage. Only when drilling the borehole may collapse, but that is quite exceptional to happen. Once installed there are no safety risks. 

What are the technical, environmental, and safety challenges of using former mines for underground heat storage?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

Challenges may vary between specific mines, dependent on what materials were extracted, to what extent, the age and current condition the mine and local geology, among many other factors. 

At the United Downs site in Cornwall, broadly, challenges included gaining an understanding of the circulation and flow of water within the workings, so that stored heat is not lost during operation, overcoming issues related to water quality in mine workings to minimise environmental risk and the risk of scaling and corrosion of underground thermal energy storage technologies installed, the development of a sound understanding of present day mine structures and condition as this has likely changed since plans were drawn, and maintaining hydrological conditions in the mine to ensure integrity of the subsurface voids are maintained. 

Will underground thermal energy storage make us more self-sufficient and less reliant on energy imports?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University: 

Yes! Underground storage means we can disconnect supply and demand, meaning that we can more easily use locally produced energy and reduce the need for fossil fuel imports. 

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

Because of the variety of technologies included in underground thermal energy storage there is also a difference on how these different aspects are considered. Systems that use and exchange not only heat but also other substance (in general water) with the subsurface generally require more comprehensive management and monitoring programs to avoid any environmental impacts or any affections to other users of the subsurface. The legal requirements vary not only by technology but also depending on the country or even region or city. Competent authorities try to adapt the legislation and monitoring requirements to their jurisdictions and have powers to enforce the law and apply sanctions. AI will probably have an increasing role to facilitate operational oversight in the future, but its current use is not widespread.  

Which combinations are particularly promising - e.g. with solar thermal energy, waste heat or district heating?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:  

Large systems are more efficient, therefore district heating with storage will increase sustainability. 

How much energy can underground heat storage provide (e.g. number of houses), and for how long? What is its role in ensuring energy security during supply fluctuations or blackouts? Do we have such energy surpluses to make it worthwhile to introduce underground heat storage?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

In the case of mine thermal energy storage, the amount of energy underground heat storage can provide depends on the size of the flooded mine and the available excess heat. For example, the pilot project in Bochum is designed to store about 12.5 GWh per year, enough to supply thousands of homes. These systems are built to last at least 30 years, with most components designed for 30–50 years. They offer a constant heat source that can help balance supply fluctuations, but during a full electricity blackout, heat can be stored underground but cannot be pumped in or out. There is plenty of surplus heat available, especially from industrial cooling processes, which makes storing it underground a practical and efficient alternative to wasting it.

How is heat from underground storage transported and distributed, including the infrastructure required (e.g., pipes, pumps), temperature control, and the feasibility of local versus long-distance energy transfer?

Answered by the PUSH-IT team

Heat is carried by water (in the case of BTES when also cooling is supplied sometimes added with an antifreeze such as glycol) through insulated pipes. Pumps circulate this fluid between the underground storage site and the heating network. For local distribution, this is very efficient. Sending heat over long distances is possible but less practical because it needs bigger pipes, more insulation, and extra pumping energy, which adds cost and heat loss, but this is done in conditions where there are for example large industrial areas with a lot of waste heat, to cities several 10’s of KM away.

What percentage of the heat is lost over time, how is this measured, and how do you stop the heat from escaping? How does this compare to conventional storage methods?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

To keep heat from escaping in underground storage, the system must be well sealed and not connected to a mine dewatering/pumping system. In the case of mine thermal energy storage, even in ideal conditions, about 20% of the heat slowly transfers into the surrounding rock over time, based on models from other projects. This is monitored using sensors in boreholes or shafts, such as fibre optics. Mines can also store heat and cold in separate depth layers, with

large distances between those reservoirs, which reduces losses compared to conventional storage systems like pit thermal energy storage (PTES).

What is UTES like underground? What is the size, influence of natural geothermal heat, soil condition, depth, pressure and method of sealing?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

In the case of underground thermal energy storage (UTES) systems that use flooded mine spaces, they can vary greatly in size. For example, the pilot project in Bochum uses about 10,000 m³, but future systems could be much larger, which improves economic feasibility. These mines are typically 100 to 1,000 meters deep, with low operating pressures (under 10 bar) in shallow mines. Natural geothermal heat has only a small influence in shallow depth; however, at 1,000 meters depth, temperatures are around 30 °C. During operation, heat spreads only a few meters into the surrounding rock. Conditions also depend on the type of mine, such as coal (Bochum) or metal ore (Cornwall). To keep the system sealed, conventional cementing methods are used in boreholes to prevent leaks.

Which materials and pipes do you use, and how do you steer the drill?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

Pipes and materials used in underground thermal energy storage must withstand contact with mine water, so stainless steel (such as 316L AISI) or composite materials are recommended for the sections running from the pump to the surface. Drilling is done with a heavy rig, typically around 30 tons, supported by a mobile crane, and for shallow depths, like the 120 m borehole in Bochum, directional drilling wasn’t needed. For deeper or more complex sites, directional drilling may be required to accurately reach the mine workings.

Status of underground thermal energy storage, and the PUSH-IT project

Where do you plan to build underground thermal energy storage facilities, and how are siting decisions made?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft:
The demo sites of PUSH-IT are at Delft, Netherlands; United Downs, Cornwall, UK; Bochum, Berlin and Darmstadt, Germany; and Litoměřice, Czech Republic). But underground thermal energy storage is also planned in many other locations around the world. underground thermal energy storage can be applied everywhere, but technologies like aquifer thermal energy storage and mine thermal energy storage require specific local geologic conditions. underground thermal energy storage is commonly applied in collective systems, so at a larger scale.

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:
Underground thermal energy storage systems are meaningful only in the vicinity of sources of surplus heat, such as waste incinerators, data centres, sources of excess green energy etc. Secondly, customers of heat/cold supply are needed, e.g. district heating networks, university campuses, hospitals. Typical underground thermal energy storage sites are located in economical parts or brown-field parts of medium-sized towns or cities.

How scalable is underground thermal energy storage? Can it be used by individual households, or is it for large companies and energy providers? And could it be used widely, even globally, especially in places with a lot of renewables?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft:
Underground thermal energy storage is commonly applied in collective systems, so at a larger scale. Underground thermal energy storage can be applied everywhere, but technologies like aquifer thermal energy storage and mine thermal energy storage require specific local geologic conditions. Underground thermal energy storage helps to overcome mismatch between any heat supply and demand, so indeed for renewable energy especially.

What are the latest innovations in underground heat storage, who developed them, and how did the idea come about?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:
The latest developments involve extending the ranges and places the systems can operate, i.e. increasing temperatures (more energy in the same volume), designing for more geological conditions, increasing knowledge of how they operate inside a complex energy system. There are also developments on materials used (temperature resilience, reducing energy losses) and how to install them (better drilling methods).

Many of the technologies are being tested within an EU project called PUSH-IT, which is made up of universities, research organisations and companies who come together to pilot full scale systems. Several technologies were used in other industries and are being adopted, and we are building on knowledge developed in other projects and, for example, in operating and researching low temperature systems.

Most of the ideas are not revolutionary, but evolutionary, i.e. they have come in steps from other research and monitoring activities and finding needs from existing energy systems (e.g. geothermal systems typically only produce energy in the winter, which makes their economics worse).

Have there been successful pilot projects that show how underground thermal energy storage works in practice, and what lessons have been learned so far about their effectiveness and chances of success?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft:
Various underground thermal energy storage systems have been deployed. Lessons learned from successful and less successful systems are valuable inputs in current new deployments and research.

How far along is the development of this technology, what are the next steps, and what plans or goals are in place for the coming years? What if it’s unsuccessful?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:  

Underground heat storage as a broad technology is very well established in many countries. The most common is borehole thermal energy storage, which is often called ground source heat, ground source heat pumps, closed-loop shallow geothermal, or other names. These are most commonly installed for single households and provide both heating and cooling, with the thermal energy (heat) stored for use in the next season, i.e. when providing heating to a building, they store ‘cool’ in the subsurface which can be used for cooling in the summer. Other types of underground heat storage can be much more efficient and store more energy, yet tend to have more geological or usage constraints. For example, in the Netherlands aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) systems are very common mostly due to appropriate underground layers and low groundwater flow – yet these are yet to be widely adopted in most other countries, but this is happening slowly. Academic and industry are also developing and testing multiple other systems such that the right system is available for the geology that is available and matching the energy system. One set of technologies that are being piloted at full scale are high temperature systems (storage temperatures of up to 90 °C). These increase the temperatures of storage, which has the key advantage of storing more energy in a smaller space, and additionally being compatible for more existing heating systems – reducing the need for extensive building refurbishment. These systems are being implemented and tested in a few locations, so that their performance can be demonstrated and further optimised. 

When will underground storage projects begin, how long does it take to develop and start using them, and why is such an ancient idea only being implemented now?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft: 

This varies from site to site. Given that underground thermal energy storage is commonly applied in collective systems, so at a larger scale, usually resulting in longer development time. Due to the energy transition the need for large scale heat storage is there. In the fossil-based energy system there was no/little need. 

How long do underground heat storage systems last, are they truly sustainable and safe over the very long term, and what guarantees are there that future generations — including my grandchildren — won’t be left with something that stops working or needs costly dismantling?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:  

The systems will last a long time. It is anticipated that they will last >50 years. The materials used are durable and usually quite simple – which means they can last a long time and are easy to make. The key advantage to heat storage is that we disconnect the energy production and energy use, i.e. heat can be produced when it is available and used when it is needed. This reduces the needed installations of other energy sources and specifically reduces the amount of fossil fuels (usually gas) needed to supply heat in the cold months. This directly means that these systems are environmentally positive and sustainable.  

In underground heat storage systems we install a means of accessing the subsurface. These are usually vertical wells (tubes inserted into the ground) which are either open (so water can be injected and extracted from the ground in order to store and extract the heat) or closed so that heat can conduct into or out of the ground. There are also some surface facilities, e.g. pumps and connecting pipes. The installations are actually very small and use very little material, especially in the subsurface. The reason for this is that the subsurface itself is where the heat is stored, rather than in a tank. This means that future dismantling is very easy.  

There are some situations where systems do not last as long as we predict. In most cases, this is to do with the subsurface permeability changing due to interactions of the subsurface fluid and the subsurface which can cause scaling (imagine the scaling you get in a water kettle after a long use). We are investigating the conditions in which this happens in order to be able to avoid it. 

How feasible is UTES considering the technological challenges, and what are the chances of success?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

Underground thermal energy storage (UTES) is still in the research and development phase, with pilot projects helping to refine best practices and estimate costs. A key technical challenge is integrating surface and underground systems effectively, but progress so far is promising. Success depends on certain conditions, for example access to flooded mines (for mine thermal

energy storage), a reliable source of surplus heat (such as from industrial cooling), and existing district heating networks that operate at medium to low temperatures. Government support for Net Zero goals and positive results from pilot schemes make the chances of success high, especially where these conditions are met.

Public involvement in underground thermal energy storage

What is the public mood on underground thermal energy storage? How can I learn more about it — see it in action, follow the research and pilot projects, understand the pros and cons, and get involved?

Answered by Merryn Thomas, Madeleine Kechagia, Iain Soutar, Mel Rohse (PUSH-IT social science team), and Serge Santoo, lead for Dissemination, Exploitation & Communication:

In 2025, the PUSH-IT social science team at the University of Exeter and Anglia Ruskin University in the UK carried out a cross-national of public perceptions of underground thermal energy storage. Analyses are ongoing, but initial results indicate that while most people are unfamiliar with underground thermal energy storage, reactions to the technology tend to be positive, notwithstanding some concerns and conditions on development.

Signup to our newsletter here to find out more about PUSH-IT’s ongoing research and various events where you can get involved and see underground thermal energy storage in action. We also regularly post to LinkedIn here. To understand the pros and cons, read onto the next section of this Q&A, on the Benefits and Risks of underground thermal energy storage.

Will local people have a real say in whether these underground heat storage projects go ahead, how transparent will the decision-making be, and will we be able to opt out if we don’t want to use this energy source?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft:
This varies from site to site and strongly depends on how local governments and operators organise this. Part of the PUSH-IT project involves finding out how members of the public respond to underground thermal energy storage, how they want to be engaged, and how they think decisions should be made. PUSH-IT also studies governance, policies, and business models. Findings will be made available for operators and governments.

Who actually benefits from underground thermal energy storage — will it be accessible and affordable for everyone, including families and people on lower incomes, or mainly for big companies and cities?

Answered by Dr. Wen Liu, energy systems modeller, Utrecht University:
I think the society as a whole will benefit from sustainable heating system with underground thermal energy storage. It is the key part in heat transition. For the space heating demand, a large-scale heat demand electrification by using heat pump will bring new challenges such as electric grid congestion, needs for more renewable power investment, etc. The costs of sustainable district heating with underground thermal energy storage need to be reduced. One of the main goals of PUSH-IT is about cost reduction. Subsidies for underground thermal energy storage are also needed to make the business case successful.

Who will own the technologies and the energy?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft:

This varies from site to site and strongly depends on how local governments and operators organise this. 

How can we be sure that the experts behind these underground heat storage projects are independent, trustworthy, and not influenced by political or financial interests — and why should we trust them after everything that’s happened in recent years?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft: 

This is a difficult question. It may vary from country-to-country or even within a country from site-to-site to what extent this is a relevant concern. 2 key general pointers I can give: 1) Ensuring ownership of collective heating systems is (partly) public is an important first step, to protect for financial incentives of commercial companies. 2) For sustainability it is important to ensure there is a renewable energy source that is properly integrated, and not only for the sake of it,, while in practice heat is delivered by fossils. 

Who guarantees that projects are safe, who insures consequential damages, and who can we hold accountable when it turns out this is bad for the environment?

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

Regulators have the role of evaluating the projects and granting the licenses for underground thermal energy storage operation under certain requirements, some established by law and others imposed specifically under determined circumstances. Operators must ensure that these requirements are met. Regulators can impose monitoring and data sharing obligations and have powers to take enforcement actions, to apply sanctions, and to start a prosecution case

Benefits, costs and risks of underground thermal energy storage

How will underground thermal energy storage affect the climate? Will it replace fossil fuels, reduce carbon emissions and slow down climate change?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
The installation of underground thermal energy storage technologies aids the seasonal mismatch of the requirement for heating and cooling vs the production of heat. The technologies allow for heat and cool to be stored in the subsurface when not required and an excess is produced, for later use during months where demand increases. In doing so, underground thermal energy storage reduces the reliance on fossil fuels to power heating or cooling systems when peak demand exceeds supply from a renewable system. If the heat/cool stored is sourced from a renewable source in the first instance, underground thermal energy storage dramatically aids decarbonisation, ensuring renewable heat/cool is not wasted. Reducing the use/burning of fossil fuels reduces net carbon emissions into the atmosphere, aiding the slowdown of anthropogenic induced climate change.

How much will the construction and operation of underground heat storage disrupt daily life for people living nearby — including noise, dust, traffic, roadworks, and possible damage to homes — and will anyone have to move?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
Although this may vary slightly project to project, the installation of an underground thermal energy storage system is very unlikely to require people to move. The projects are planned to cause as little impact as possible and where drilling is involved, as systems are often shallow only small rigs/apparatus are required.

Noise, dust and other impacts associated with installation can be minimised throughout development through screening and other mitigating activities. Often these activities are required as a result of permitting (e.g. UK Planning Permission).

Can underground thermal energy storage damage former mines and negatively impact on tourism?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
Full examination of historic mine workings would be conducted prior to the installation of mine thermal energy storage technologies, including but not limited to thorough evaluation of historic mine plans, as well as hydrological and geochemical surveys to understand the potential impacts of an installation. Damage to former mines would be avoided at all costs to avoid any adverse environmental impacts or improper running of an installed system. Where such impacts are possible either changes to the design of the system are required or the site would not be considered.

In the case of mine thermal energy storage, sites being evaluated are completely flooded historic mine workings. There would be very little infrastructure required at the surface, which is unlikely to damage any surface tourism activities or impact a site visually.

Will you ensure none of our heritage and history is damaged, such as old hedges and houses?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

Any potential impact to important historical sites would be evaluated in the planning stage and assessed as part of the permitting process (e.g. UK Planning Process). In the case of mine thermal energy storage, it is likely that mines will be accessed via the drilling of boreholes or through open shafts away from historic mining structures, close to the heat source/heat demand (extant developments). 

Will underground heat storage projects lead to job losses, or create well-paid job and training opportunities for local people — like in engineering and technical roles? Will existing businesses be negatively affected during site exploration or development?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

Despite being demonstrated at a number of sites across Europe, underground thermal energy storage technologies are still yet to be broadly adopted. Demonstration of the installation of these technologies, especially with a high temperature heat source will encourage development in the sector, which will contributed to the creation of technical jobs. Furthermore, underground thermal energy storage technologies will contribute to development of district heating systems, encouraging development across other sectors. 

Can you guarantee that underground heat storage won’t impact house prices or affect land records and property boundaries?

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

The use of aquifers, boreholes or mines to store energy should not affect to a great extent land records and property boundaries as it makes use of the subsurface in an efficient way with minimal surface space use. The impact on house prices might be positive, as it provides a way to decarbonise energy for both heating and cooling. 

How much will underground heat storage cost to build, operate, and decommission — and how does it compare to other options like nuclear and above-ground green energy options?

Answered by Dr. Wen Liu, energy systems modeller, Utrecht University:  

The costs have a range and depends on the storage technologies, as shown in Figure 10 in this paper: Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage: A techno-economic literature review. For the second question, they are not comparable. Underground thermal storage is a unit of storage, other options like nuclear and green energy options, like geothermal energy, are energy supply technologies. It is only comparable with the following groups: 1) a heating system with and without an underground thermal storage; 2) costs of different underground thermal storage. 

Who pays for underground thermal energy storage projects — including any government subsidies — and is there enough funding to complete them fully?

Answered by Danitsja van Heusden-van Winden, EC Project Coordinator at Innovation & Impact Centre, Technische Universiteit Delft: 

Who pays for the underground thermal energy storage projects strongly varies from site to site. Commonly the energy system/underground thermal energy storage owner and operator pays for the assets (either from own cash or borrowed). Sometimes municipalities/government, (inter)national funding agencies may add subsidy, which is usually not sufficient to fully pay for the underground thermal energy storage. For the PUSH-IT cases, the EC funding is insufficient to fully cover the underground thermal energy storage project, so the parties involved in the project invest own resources to this. 

Will underground heat storage actually save me money on my energy bills, or will the high development costs be passed on to consumers — especially those who don’t live near the storage sites?

Answered by Dr. Wen Liu, energy systems modeller, Utrecht University:  

The current underground heat storage is applied with a regional district heating system (collective heating with pipes). It can hardly serve energy for individuals houses. People don’t live nearby the storage is ok as far as district heating exist and people has connection with the grids. The existing studies focused on the system costs (such as levelized cost of energy), project costs (net present value) but very limited research focused on the end-user costs. From the heating system costs (LCOE) prospective, the use of underground heat storage can bring positive economic benefits to reduce the system costs but under certain conditions (optimized component size, e.g., heat supply capacity and storage capacity). 

Is underground thermal energy storage healthy for the Earth? Does it affect the core or cool down the Earth’s heat?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

Underground thermal energy storage technologies are installed in the upper few hundred metres of the Earth’s crust (<0.00008% of the diameter of the Earth) and have no meaningful impact to the Earth’s internal temperature. 

Could underground heat storage cause flooding or ground instability — like sinkholes, subsidence, earthquakes, or landslides — especially in areas with old mines or sensitive geology? How will risks to nearby homes and properties be monitored and managed?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

A full assessment of the potential impacts of an installed system will be evaluated and modelled prior to installation, with learnings from other successful projects being implemented. Geological assessment of a potential site is vital to ensure that the impacts referenced in the question are avoided. In the case of mine thermal energy storage in old mine workings, water level, geochemistry and temperatures would be monitored at all times, in addition to the monitoring of mine water outflows etc. throughout development and operation.  

Is it safe to concentrate so much heat underground? 80 degrees is quite a lot. Could it cause fires, explosions, overheating, long-term harm to the ground or climate?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

As part of each project, assessment is made over the potential impacts of high-temperature underground thermal energy storage. The installation of such technologies would not cause fires or explosions with the storage mediums being rock and/or water. Storage of the temperature will be in a discreet region of the subsurface and should not affect the surface or wider area. Site selection for underground thermal energy storage requires a geological setting in which heat can be confined into a specific area in the subsurface and not ‘lost’. 

Any potential environmental harm would be assessed in the planning of the project and throughout operation. To gain permitting for a project, proof would have to be obtained that such negative impacts are not being made, or sufficient mitigations are put in place. 

What are the risks of underground heat storage — including worst-case scenarios, long-term safety, and potential harm to people or workers — and what guarantees do you have that it’s truly safe and responsibly managed?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

Underground heat storage carries some risks, mainly during drilling and operation. Depending on geology and water quality, workers on site may face hazards such as methane leaks or skin irritation (in case of incorrect use of PPE), e.g., from handling mine water.

The worst-case scenario would be a local collapse around the drill hole. The potential scale of a collapse is difficult to predict, but based on experience at the Litoměřice (borehole thermal energy storage) drill site, a local collapse around a drill hole would likely cause little to no surface damage. In rare cases, especially in shallow or poorly mapped mines, a collapse could lead to subsidence or a sinkhole, potentially damaging buildings or roads.

One additional risk could be that during operation, the system fails – without a backup heating source, this would mean a loss of heat for the network connected to the storage.

Risks are managed through site-specific assessments, monitoring, a health and safety plan, and, for example, a liability agreement with the mine owner.

What will the above-ground parts of the underground heat storage system look like, and how much will they affect the character and beauty of the landscape that I love so much?

Answered by the PUSH-IT team

Drill rigs are used during construction, but after this time, underground thermal energy storage has little visible infrastructure. You might see a manhole cover in the pavement, or a well-housing that is 0.5-1m above the ground and 1×1 in lateral dimensions.

Is underground heat storage safe for public health — could it lead to the release of harmful gases, heavy metals, contamination of water, or long-term health risks like disease or cancer?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University

Yes, it is safe. For example, there are ~3500 ATES systems operating, with no public health concerns. The groundwater used in the system isn’t in contact with heating systems or distribution to houses – we use a heat exchanger which means the fluid extracted has the heat removed and then is reinjected. In the subsurface, the fluid and rock may contain some substances (either natural substances, or those from past pollution) that can impact health. These are either removed and carefully disposed of or reinjected to where they came from.

What impact will underground heat storage have on the environment — including wildlife, soil health, forests, and underground ecosystems — and how environmentally friendly is it compared to other energy sources?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University

The projects will heat up or cool down subsurface layers, usually several 10s or 100s metres below the surface. We store heat from sustainable sources, reducing carbon dioxide emissions substantially as compared with fossil sources – therefore it is very environmentally friendly. The change in temperature will impact the local microbial activity close to the storage aquifer and very locally to it, i.e. also 10s to 100s metres below the surface. At the surface there will be no impact to the wildlife, soil health, forests or the shallow subsurface. We model and monitor temperatures close to the system to ensure that the surface temperatures (or temperatures in other resources, e.g. drinking water) are not impacted.

How do the costs, dangers and impacts of UTES compare with other technologies such as gas extraction, fracking, nuclear power, mining and windmills?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

This is a difficult question because each of these technologies brings its own costs, risks and benefits. However, broadly, a few examples might help. Drilling into flooded mines for underground thermal energy storage (UTES) is generally less expensive and less hazardous than oil or gas drilling, where blowout preventers are needed to manage high-pressure gas and/or oil. Methane leaks are unlikely in UTES projects, and if they occur, there are proven countermeasures in place to control them. UTES uses smaller rigs, requires shorter drilling times, and has a much lower risk of ground pollution than oil or gas operations. Unlike nuclear power, it produces no radioactive waste and only minimal material disposal from drilling. Above-ground infrastructure is minimal, the land footprint is small, and the technology is completely invisible in the landscape in comparison to e.g. wind farms.

PUSH-IT locations

What would be the benefit of developing this technology in Cornwall over the rest of the UK?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
Large parts of Cornwall are not contacted to the UK Gas Mains and rely on expensive and carbon intensive single-dwelling oil and gas heating. mine thermal energy storage development in Cornwall could play an important role in increasing the viability of low carbon heating projects, such as geothermal heating, as would aid in meeting peak demands for heating in the winter.

Why did you give up at Mabe [Cornwall] last time?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
The Hot Dry Rock (HDR) project at Rosemanowes Quarry project ended due to the removal of its funding. However, the learnings from this project have been vital in bringing the current geothermal projects in Cornwall online.

We [Cornwall] are the poorest county [in the UK], will it benefit us?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
Decarbonisation of the county’s heating systems whether residential or industrial can aid in the reduction of costs associated with heating. Cornwall has a rich industrial history which would provide the structures (in this instance, abandoned mines) to install this sort of project.

What impact will it have on our lands, our fields, Cornish hedges and seasides? Will you make sure that no history is damaged? Not even old houses will be touched?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

A full assessment of the potential impact of a mine thermal energy storage system would be required during the planning and permitting process with input from key stakeholders and regulatory authorities. Protections for historic features and protected environments would be put in place. In the case of a mine thermal energy storage system, the heat storage would need to be located in close proximity to a heat source and heat user, and therefore would likely be placed in an area already having undergone development, located over or proximal to subsurface mine workings. 

Given the honey combed nature of West Cornwall can we be sure that sub-surface storage of, in particular, water can be contained?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

This is an interesting question and is one of the key questions to address in the United Downs Feasibility Study in the PUSH-IT project. An underground thermal energy storage system requires minimal heat loss, for which a large mine system with abundant flow or circulation is not the most suitable. Evaluation of small, ‘self-contained’ mine workings or identification of poorly connected sections of larger mines are one way to overcome this. If a mine is deemed unsuitable, a project would not be economically or technically viable and would not proceed beyond feasibility. 

What would a development such as that at United Downs generate in terms of heating? Would the benefits extend only to the local area or across the county?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

It is yet to be determined what the maximum heat storage in a mine adjacent to United Downs would be, and is likely to be limited by the modelled size of the storage reservoir within the mines, as opposed to heat available (due to the large heat resource available at the United Downs Geothermal Power Plant). However, if a project were to progress at United Downs, heat stored would likely only be utilised by local communities and industry, due to the difficulty and expense of transporting heating long distances. 

Can this benefit all of the Redruth area?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:  

In the future, yes, if mines are deemed to be suitable for heat storage, mine thermal energy storage could be installed. 

Will it alter the area as peel ports has in Bootle in Liverpool?

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

An advantage of underground thermal energy storage is that by making use of the subsurface the visual impact is minimal. Experience from other countries shows totally the opposite, regenerating areas that make use of these systems are more attractive to live as the surface space that is freed by using the subsurface can be used by the community.  

There are no caves or mines where I live (SE UK) – [is underground thermal energy storage still possible?]

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

There are various technological options to use the underground for thermal energy storage that do not require caves or mines. Aquifers (permeable layers that can store and transmit water) are excellent media for seasonal thermal energy storage. If there are not permeable geological layers it is possible to use boreholes in a closed-loop mode (no water is exchanged with the ground, only the heat), and other options such as pits or underground tanks. The UK Geothermal Platform shows an overview of geothermal opportunities in the UK https://ukgtp.bgs.ac.uk/ 

What is the long-term efficiency and cost effectiveness of underground heat storage compared to other energy storage solutions in a temperate climate like London's?

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

There are not many comparisons for the UK as the market for underground thermal energy storage in Britain is still very small, however the experience in other countries, especially in the Netherlands with similar climate is very positive and there are thousands of installations that provide not only heating, but also cooling to buildings.

I would like to ask what is the percentage of existing underground space Vs the provision be in each UK area?

Answered by Andrés González Quirós, Senior Geothermal Scientist, British Geological Survey: 

It is difficult to put a number at the UK scale, but most of the underground is suitable for thermal energy storage using the variety of technological options. Even if no mines or aquifers are present it is possible to use other solutions such underground heat exchangers or tanks. There are however some areas where no solution is suitable or allowed for a variety of reasons: existence of subsurface infrastructure, protected areas, etc. The UK Geothermal Platform shows an overview of geothermal opportunities in the UK https://ukgtp.bgs.ac.uk/ 

Why Litoměřice?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

The town of Litoměřice has a long tradition in geothermal research with long-term support of local government. Already in 2007, a 2111-meter-deep exploratory geothermal well was drilled for scientific evaluation of the geothermal potential. In 2014, the RINGEN scientific research centre was established in Litoměřice, which is continuously expanding its geothermal research activities. Joining the PUSH-IT consortium is therefore an excellent opportunity for the Litoměřice site to stay on top of the latest trends in geothermal research of EU countries. 

What are the results and what comes from the experiences in Litoměřice?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

The main results are coming from the two wells drilled in May 2025 (516 m and 202 m deep boreholes). The hydrogeological conditions and heat-transfer parameters are being evaluated for optimal design of the Litoměřice heat storage. The preliminary results confirm that various underground thermal energy storage solutions are feasible on the Litoměřice site. 

Are there other locations in the Czech Republic?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

Yes, a small borehole thermal energy storage research facility is located on the campus of VŠB-TUO and several other geothermal solutions are implemented for heating and cooling of large buildings, e.g. the ČSOB Building at Radlická. However, Litoměřice will be the first example of borehole thermal energy storage technology connected to the district heating network in the Czech Republic. 

Is it realistic in Prague and inhabited quarters?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

In Prague and other large urban areas, underground thermal energy storage technology is the ideal heating and cooling solution. In fact, some TES systems are already in various stages of development – for example in the underground line D or Smíchov city that are currently in construction, or other such as the ČSOB building at Radlická in Prague, which is already in operation. TES technology can be effectively implemented wherever there is a source of excess heat, the heat consumer is located at a reasonable distance, and the bedrock does not contain fast-flowing groundwater. The only barriers to greater expansion of TES technology is the lack of legislation addressing this technology, and, as a result, the reluctance of investors to fund such projects. 

I would like to know whether these underground repositories can be made everywhere - for example I know that in the village where my parents live about 4km away there are shafts, but gold and uranium were mined, would this location be suitable? Mainly because of uranium mining and then how much it will affect the landscape in the vicinity of many significantly protected areas.

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

In case the mine is flooded, it can be considered for mine thermal energy storage. However, detailed site investigation including mapping, geophysical and hydrogeological investigations is needed to answer this question properly. Every system is custom-made for the site and purpose. Generally, underground thermal energy storage solutions include careful environmental planning and monitoring and belong to the most nature-friendly energy technologies. A possible limiting factor for mine thermal energy storage implementation in some historical mining areas in Czechia is a lack of surplus heat sources combined with the lack of the end-users in the area. 

Will it ever be implemented in the Moravian region? Could this be implemented in former coal mines, for example in Kladno?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:   

If local investors or decision-makers are in favour, then yes. Technically, it is viable. In order to store heat in mines, the mine must be flooded with water, there must be a source of excess heat on the surface and an end-user for the heat. These three basic conditions are met in Kladno, as well as in other former coal mines in urban areas, for example in Ostrava region. One of the PUSH-IT test sites, Bochum, is a former coal mining town where mine thermal energy storage technology is being developed. 

What is needed to realize this on a large scale within a few years? For example, the Netherlands is already quite full of solar panels.

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft: 

Underground thermal energy storage is commonly applied in collective systems, so at a larger scale. underground thermal energy storage can be applied everywhere. Underground thermal energy storage helps to overcome mismatch between any heat supply and demand, so when such conditions occur it can be useful.  Given that underground thermal energy storage is commonly applied in collective systems, so at a larger scale, usually resulting in longer development time. 

How long can we use the storage planned in the Netherlands?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft: 

In principle indefinitely as long as wells are maintained such they are able to keep pumping the groundwater. The subsurface will stay there, as long as we can keep using the groundwater to transport heat to/from it, we can use the subsurface to store thermal energy. 

Where and in how many places in the Netherlands could this possibly be?

Answered by Dr. Martin Bloemendal, Principal Investigator for PUSH-IT, Delft: 

Any place where there is a large temporal mismatch in supply and demand for thermal energy underground thermal energy storage can be useful to apply. Depending on the scale, temperature level and geological conditions, the right technology can be selected. 

When will district heating come to NRW so we no longer have to heat with gas?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

District heating is already available in some areas of North Rhine-Westphalia, such as Bochum, and you can check current coverage on the Energieatlas NRW. The expansion of heating networks is now guided by the Heat Planning Act (Wärmeplanungsgesetz), which requires all municipalities to develop heat plans to achieve climate-neutral heating by 2045.

Do you think that the government is more of a problem or a good support when it comes to underground heat storage? Because generally, I have the feeling that many good ideas in Germany are often implemented very slowly.

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

The government is generally supportive of underground heat storage and geothermal energy. The Heat Planning Act (Wärmeplanungsgesetz) and the Geothermal Acceleration Act (Geothermiebeschleunigungsgesetz) aim to speed up planning and approval processes. While implementation in Germany can feel slow, these new regulations are designed to make things move faster in the coming years, especially to help meet Net Zero targets.

How suitable is the process for geological fault zones (e.g. edge of the Upper Rhine Graben)?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

In the case of underground thermal energy storage in former mines, geological fault zones are not suitable. Faults can compromise stability and sealing, which are essential for safe and efficient operation of mine thermal energy storage.

Why was this area chosen [question from survey respondent in Niedersachsen]?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

The mine thermal energy storage pilot site in Bochum was chosen because it has all the key conditions for success: a flooded underground mine, a large source of surplus heat from the university’s technical centre, and an existing heating and cooling network to distribute the stored energy. These factors make the location ideal for testing and demonstrating the technology.

Miscellaneous

Would you be happy to have such a facility immediately next to your house?

Answered by Veronika Slavíková, Vít Peřestý, Lucie Janků and Josef Vlček, RINGEN, Litoměřice, Czech Republic:
Thermal energy storage (TES) systems are generally less disrupting to the local environment and population than conventional (fossil-fuelled) heating solutions. TES systems do not release any smoke, vapour or chemicals, their surface area is relatively small and noise is limited. This is why they are becoming the sought-after solution for populated areas (there already are a range of working examples from all over Europe where geothermal heating and/or cooling has been successfully implemented). Temporary discomfort may occur especially during the drilling phase of underground thermal energy storage system development. Traffic disruption and increased noise and dust levels may cause temporary inconvenience to the local population, similarly to any other construction. When the system is in operation, it does not cause any disturbance. From the practical point of view, underground thermal energy storage systems are built close to the source of excess heat (typically industrial facilities) as well as close to the heat demand (district heating network supplier, hospitals, campuses, …), thus areas commonly without permanent residents. Yes, we would be happy to have such a facility next to our house.

What are you most excited about this opportunity?

Answered by Thomas Olver, Project and Research Coordinator, Geothermal Engineering Ltd, Cornwall, UK:
Geothermal Engineering Ltd are excited about the potential role mine thermal energy storage technologies could hold within the ‘co-production’ of power, heat and Critical Raw Materials from a single geothermal resource. Maximising the use of this resource lowers the cost of production and creates more jobs within a single project.

Which single "game changer" technically, economically, or politically could make underground thermal energy storage the standard solution in cities?

Answered by Phil Vardon, Professor of Energy Geo-Mechanics at Delft University:
Raising temperatures to increase compatibility with existing heating systems will make storage more compatible with existing heating systems, increase compatibility with geothermal, solar and waste heat. This is a game changer, and requires several smaller technological and regulatory innovations.

What is your motivation for doing this?

Answered by Elke Mugova and Stefan Klein, Fraunhofer, Bochum mine thermal energy storage site, Germany

It is exciting to be directly involved in the development of a new technology. We see great potential in geothermal applications, and it is a great opportunity to repurpose old mines and thereby enable a renewed valorisation.

Feel free to contact us

PUSH-IT is a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101096566.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Subscribe to the PUSH-IT Newsletter!